Faculty evaluation can be a dynamic process centered on purposeful professional growth that is both manageable and meaningful. While research-informed frameworks like those developed by Marzano and Danielson offer structured approaches, successful evaluation models recognize that faculty growth hinges on ownership and authenticity, encouraging schools to develop frameworks that reflect their unique mission and values. Rather than simply checking boxes, effective evaluation processes identify the essential traits of exemplary team members, build consensus through transparent processes, and ultimately transform performance reviews into opportunities for reinvestment in talented educators.
In independent schools, the dual processes of head evaluation and board self-assessment form essential governance pillars that strengthen institutional effectiveness. When conducted properly, head evaluation enhances communication between the head and board around strategic priorities while establishing clear annual goals with appropriate assessment measures. Simultaneously, board self-evaluation brings clarity to trustee roles, creates a common understanding of the board’s current position, and inspires continuous improvement in governance practices. Both processes should be systematic and well-planned, with specific objectives and methodologies. Through regular evaluation, boards fulfill their due diligence while supporting the school leader, and trustees gain valuable insights about their effectiveness. Together, these complementary assessment practices ensure mission alignment, strengthen leadership capacity, and ultimately advance the school.
